Announcement

Do not use the forums to submit bug reports, feature requests or patches, submit a New Ticket instead.

#651 Re: User Discussion & Help » Automatic link creation » 2005-08-02 01:52:22

It should already work that way.

In IE, IE actually does it (and i don't know how to turn it off), in Gecko based browsers we simulate the effect (and make it better, you can hit ESC (I think it was ESC) to cancel the auto-link immediatly after it links it)

Just type for example www.example.com or bob@example.com and they should turn into links.

#652 Re: User Discussion & Help » stylistLoadStyles is not a function » 2005-07-29 22:34:23

That is exactly what you are calling.  If you don't load the Stylist plugin, then that function isn't available.

#653 Re: User Discussion & Help » ImageManager: show Image without GD-Library » 2005-07-29 22:32:44

ImageManager can also use ImageMagick.  See the config.php

/**
* Image Library to use.
*
* Possible values: 'GD', 'IM', or 'NetPBM'
*
* The image manipulation library to use, either GD or ImageMagick or NetPBM.
* If you have safe mode ON, or don't have the binaries to other packages, 
* your choice is 'GD' only. Other packages require Safe Mode to be off.
*
* DEFAULT: GD is probably the most likely to be available. 
*/

$IMConfig['IMAGE_CLASS'] = 'GD';

#654 Re: User Discussion & Help » Sumit to Publish » 2005-07-29 22:29:50

php-hobby wrote:

I need help submitting the 'ta' or 'myTextArea' variable to a publishing script.

Provided Xinha is working for you it will submit as normal, as if it was a plain textarea (infact it is a plain textarea).

#655 Re: User Discussion & Help » toggleBorder color » 2005-07-25 22:00:10

See htmlarea.css and htmlarea.js, somewhere in there.

#656 Re: User Discussion & Help » AsciiMath plugin for Xinha » 2005-07-22 21:18:49

If you would like this included in Xinha, please create a ticket and attach your plugin (zipped) to it, and include the changes that are necessary (don't post the whole file smile) to the htmlarea.js file and note the revision of htmlarea.js you made the changes against (you can find the revision in the top few lines of the file, or the About dialog in Xinha itself).

Somebody will review it as soon as we can.

#657 Re: User Discussion & Help » l10n lc-parser script » 2005-07-22 21:15:41

Yes, I think in the repositiory.  Perhaps if we make a "contrib" directory and it can go in there, perhaps with some documentation on how to write new translations.

I'll leave it in your capable hands niko smile

#658 Re: User Discussion & Help » Vertical Display of Icons » 2005-07-22 21:11:42

You must be using an old version, this bug was fixed a week or two back.

#659 Re: User Discussion & Help » ImageManager path » 2005-07-20 06:48:01

Have a play with the stripBaseHref config option, and also the baseHref config option

  xinha_config.baseHref = 'something/here';
  xinha_config.stripBaseHref = true/false;

#660 Re: User Discussion & Help » Weird behavior in firefox » 2005-07-19 19:20:58

re: source formatting.

You can use the HTMLTidy or SuperClean plugins to do this in Mozilla.

#661 Re: User Discussion & Help » Weird behavior in firefox » 2005-07-19 19:18:33

markwu wrote:

In htmlarea 3.0 I can use the row="20" to control the hight of textarea, but this seems not wowks with xinha.

Fixed in revision 278 (http://xinha.python-hosting.com/ticket/404) thanks.

#662 Re: User Discussion & Help » Memory Usage Problem Solution » 2005-07-19 07:37:21

For comparison Kim, are the FCK & Tiny using any plugins (or whatever they use), or more to the point, do they have all the features taht your 8-Plugin Xinha had ? smile

How does Xinha compare with no plugins to a no-plugin FCK or Tiny?

#663 User Discussion & Help » Memory Usage Problem Solution » 2005-07-19 02:43:30

gogo
Replies: 6

I just want to draw current developer's (and anybody else who wants to help) attention to this... http://xinha.python-hosting.com/ticket/30

Thanks, we now return to your regularly scheduled programming (pun intended) smile

#664 Re: User Discussion & Help » focus editor option off? » 2005-07-18 23:49:20

I found the reason I made that change,  http://xinha.python-hosting.com/ticket/202

essentially if you clicked a button in the toolbar before focusing the editor bad things would happen.  This is the right way of fixing this, it was either just make the buttons silently not work, or make that visible by greying them out, as every other software interface does.

#665 Re: User Discussion & Help » xinha_config.pageStyleSheets and plugins » 2005-07-18 18:39:12

I'm aware of the problem with Linker, I almost have a solution (in inline-dialog.js there are some 'px' missing off the end of width & height specifications), but it has exposed another problem (when hiding and showing all panels, which happens when inline dialogs are shown, the right side panel (at least) "jumps out" of the table, it's own width, offset to the right), which seems to be a bug in mozilla, but I havn't been successfull in either writing a testcase or finding a decent workaround (setting the table display:none and then display:table brings it back, but a) that's not great, and b) we have to deactivate the editor before doing it).

#666 Re: User Discussion & Help » W3C WAI accessibility? » 2005-07-18 07:53:40

Nope, nobody workign on anythng like this to me knowledge.

#667 Re: User Discussion & Help » toolbar/icon size » 2005-07-17 23:55:29

*Ahem* BETA

flowToolbars is designed so that you don't need to design your toolbar even if adding in lots of plugins, it will "flow" so that it doesn't blow everything out of proportion.  This is why it's the default, because it means users don't need to design a toolbar to get started (and we can chuck plugins into the example without changing the toolbar).

#668 Re: User Discussion & Help » focus editor option off? » 2005-07-17 23:49:52

There is a reason for the initial disabled status of the editors if you have a dig through the tickets you'll find it, I can't remember off the top of my head.  However it certainly doesn't unload and reload plugins - unless you're seeing something I'm not, in which case please submit a ticket.

Also remember: THIS IS BETA SOFTWARE - THINGS WILL BREAK, THIS IS TO BE EXPECTED !!!

#669 Re: User Discussion & Help » Xinha Broken in Firefox Nightly » 2005-07-17 23:45:09

If it's working in one version, and not in another, then it's gotta be a bug in firefox smile  If it's broken in the next firefox release we'll look then, but not worth time to check & fix in firefox nightlies.

#670 Re: User Discussion & Help » list under list » 2005-07-17 23:39:52

Well, you're missing closing tags but I think this would do that...

Hit the unordered list button
hit enter
hit the indent-left button
hit enter
hit enter
hit the indent-right button
hit enter
unclick the unordered list button

#671 Re: User Discussion & Help » XINHA messes up HTML v4.01 compliant code to non working XHTML code! » 2005-07-17 23:38:05

Indeed, iframe requires a full closing tag, as does script (with src) I believe.  Can you submit that as a ticket for Version 1.0, thanks.

#672 Re: User Discussion & Help » Why using XHTML in most of Xinha popups when it is NOT XHTML page ? » 2005-07-17 23:36:12

There are two considerations:

1. The (x)html of the popups, and xinha-editor itself
2. The (x)html produced by Xinha (inside the editor)

In the first case, our objective should not be "conforming to standards 100%" it is "well formed and working" - that is, "tag soup" is fine, as long as it's well formed (tags closed, no invalid nesting, quoted attributes, lower case etc) and it works in the browsers we care about (currently Gecko and IE, later Safari (or maybe even generic KHTML if that's possible now)).  Personally, I don't give a rats if the html in the dialogs conforms to any particular standard as long as they work and are tidy - if this was a generic interface thave could be used by alternate devices or whatever then I'd be more concerned, but it's not, it's Javascript heavy, Gecko and IE only, as long as it works there, no problem.

For the (x)html coming out of Xinha, we don't have a lot of control.  Infact, we have very little control - the browser makes the HTML.  For example when the user clicks the bold button, we just tell the browser "the user said 'do bold'", it's the browser that works out what needs to be bolded, and how it should be done, we don't get to do anything about that.  In short, the (x)html coming out of Xinha is going to be well-formed, but if it's valid for any specification, not a hope.

#674 Re: User Discussion & Help » Terminology : CSS1Compat and BackCompat » 2005-07-17 23:15:58

These are the strings returned by document.compatMode

CSS1Compat is "standards compliant mode"
BackCompat is "quirks mode"

for both browsers.

#675 Re: User Discussion & Help » Safari 2.0 -- will we be compatible? » 2005-06-27 12:42:36

Nobody is working on it.  There are no plans to do so, unless a keen developer with a mac comes along, or somebody buys me a mini-mac, or konq gets a 100% compatable content editable system.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB